Data Analysis Has Potential to Improve Community Supervision
October 1, 2016
GPS-based electronic monitoring systems are widely used to track the locations of individuals under community supervision. These systems produce a wealth of data, some of it relevant, much of it not. That data-glut can overwhelm the supervising officer. Data analytic software can increase monitoring efficiency by winnowing through the data and organizing it so that the officer is only presented relevant information when they need it.
Data analytic software can also increase monitoring effectiveness. It can provide insights into the individual’s habits and social networks, and potential future actions. Those insights can enable the supervising officer to understand better the individual’s risks, criminogenic needs, the effectiveness of the programs and services provided to address those needs, as well as the degree to which the individual is utilizing them.
Despite the potential for data analytic software to improve community supervision, a new study undertaken for NIJ by the Applied Physics Laboratory at the John’s Hopkins University finds that agencies that use these systems do not always factor the analytic capabilities of the firms that they contract with nor of their products into procurement decisions.
The information contained in this study may benefit agencies considering implementing such systems. Released in May 2016, this study
GPS Monitoring Practices in Community Supervision and the Potential Impact of Advanced Analytics, Version 1.0 (pdf 42 pages) reviews research on the usage of GPS-based electronic monitoring systems to assess the potential role of advanced analytics to enhance the capabilities of such systems. Included in the study is a summary of the analytics capabilities claimed by vendors for commercially available software.
The information provided in this study derives in part from another study conducted by the Johns Hopkins University for NIJ, see Market Survey of Offender Tracking Technologies Gives Agencies a Snapshot of Available Products. Released in May 2016, the study provides information on 13 commercially available technologies provided by 10 different vendors.
These reports provide an overview of commercially available technology at the time of publication. Agencies seeking to implement electronic monitoring systems should solicit additional information from the field before making any decisions.
Agencies seeking to implement such systems may also want to consider
NIJ Standard-1004.00 Criminal Justice Offender Tracking Standard (pdf, 131 pages). The standard published in July 2016 provides minimum performance requirements that agencies may want to consider incorporating into their procurement specifications. It was developed for NIJ a special technical committee composed of expert practitioners representing, such diverse agencies as the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Harris County (TX) Pretrial Services, as well as scientists and experts in performance testing and conformity assessment. The American Jail Association, National Sheriffs’ Association, and the American Probation and Parole Association, among others, also participated in development of this standard.
About this Article
The work described in the article was supported by NIJ cooperative agreement number
2013-MU-CX-K111, awarded to Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, which hosts NIJ’s National Criminal Justice Technology Research, Test and Evaluation Center.
This article is based on the grant report
Monitoring Practices in Community Supervision and the Potential Impact of Advanced Analytics, Version 1.0 (pdf, 42 pages).
Cite this Article
National Institute of Justice, "Data Analysis Has Potential to Improve Community Supervision," October 1, 2016, from NIJ.gov: http://nij.gov/topics/corrections/community/monitoring-technologies/Pages/data-analysis-to-improve-community-supervision.aspx
Date Created: October 1, 2016